VanEck has proposed several budget-neutral strategies to help the U.S. expand its Bitcoin reserve without relying on taxpayer funds. According to analysis shared by Matthew Sigel, these strategies include financial mechanisms such as revaluing gold reserves, issuing Bitcoin-backed bonds, modifying Federal Reserve policies, and utilizing surplus government assets.
VanEck Proposes Gold Revaluation and Bitcoin Bonds for Reserve Growth
Following President Trump’s executive order to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, Matthew Sigel outlined key ways the U.S. could increase its Bitcoin holdings without impacting the federal budget. One major strategy involves revaluing gold reserves, which could generate significant financial resources if approved by Congress. Adjusting gold’s official valuation would unlock capital that could then be used to acquire more Bitcoin.

VanEck
Another proposed method is issuing Bitcoin-backed bonds, where the U.S. Treasury could sell bonds at a premium and use the proceeds to purchase Bitcoin. These bonds would be collateralized by Bitcoin, allowing bondholders to be repaid in either BTC or U.S. dollars upon maturity. This approach would attract institutional investors while integrating Bitcoin into government debt instruments.
Meanwhile, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has authorized Federal Banks to engage in cryptocurrency activities, including stablecoin transactions, custody services, and DeFi participation such as node validation. These regulatory advancements reflect a pro-crypto shift under the Trump administration.
Leveraging the Federal Reserve and IMF for Bitcoin Expansion
VanEck also suggested modifying the Federal Reserve’s surplus fund policies to facilitate Bitcoin acquisitions. Historically, the Fed maintained larger surplus reserves before legislative restrictions in 2015. If Congress were to adjust these policies, the Federal Reserve could redirect excess funds toward expanding the Bitcoin Reserve.
Another avenue involves advocating for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to include Bitcoin in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)—a global reserve asset used by IMF member countries. If successful, this move would elevate Bitcoin’s status as an international financial asset. While this strategy would require diplomatic negotiations, it could be executed without direct congressional approval.
Selling Government Assets to Acquire Bitcoin
Beyond traditional financial strategies, VanEck proposed selling surplus government assets to fund Bitcoin purchases. One unconventional idea is selling 1.4 billion pounds of government-stored cheese, estimated to be worth between $2 billion and $4 billion. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has the authority to offload excess dairy products, potentially providing a direct funding source for Bitcoin without requiring congressional approval.
Another potential funding method involves tapping into the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), a self-funded government entity historically used to manage foreign exchange reserves. Since the ESF operates outside congressional appropriations, it could facilitate Bitcoin acquisitions independently.
Challenges and Policy Considerations for Bitcoin Reserve Expansion
While VanEck’s proposals present viable budget-neutral solutions, many would require policy changes and regulatory approval. Strategies such as gold revaluation and Federal Reserve surplus adjustments would necessitate congressional approval, while IMF-related changes would involve international negotiations.
Additionally, Crypto Czar David Sacks recently revealed that the U.S. government lost over $17 billion by selling 195,000 BTC over the past decade. He criticized previous administrations for lacking a long-term Bitcoin strategy, arguing that retaining Bitcoin holdings could have provided significant financial benefits for taxpayers.
President Donald Trump also stressed the importance of stablecoin legislation at a recent crypto summit, pushing for regulatory clarity before Congress’ summer recess. He emphasized that clear crypto regulations would accelerate financial innovation and economic growth, reinforcing the U.S.’s position as a leader in the digital asset space.